Tinubu’s popularity is on the decline, according to Lukman, former vice chair of the APC.

Salihu Lukman, the former National Vice Chairman (North-West) of the All Progressives Congress (APC), tendered his resignation from the APC National Working Committee just before the appointment of former Kano State Governor, Abdullahi Umar Ganduje, as the APC National Chairman. In a recent interaction with a group of journalists in Abuja, including TAIWO AMODU, the former Director General of the Progressive Governors Forum (PGF), the forum of APC Governors, shared insights into his perspective.

There is a perception that you are quite critical of individuals in leadership roles, ranging from former national chairmen of the APC to serving senators and even the president. Do you view this approach as genuinely progressive within the context of your membership in the APC?

I believe it’s unjust to claim that I only criticize without acknowledging the positive aspects. Let me clarify, I have a close relationship with Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, evident in my active support during his declaration for the national chairmanship. I even contributed to crafting his declaration speech. My endorsement of him demonstrates my recognition of his merits. However, supporting someone doesn’t mean turning a blind eye to their mistakes. The real challenge arises when providing constructive advice to leaders, as distinguishing genuine assistance from opportunistic flattery becomes difficult.

Leaders often find it challenging to discern between sincere support and self-serving praise due to the multitude of demands surrounding them. Unfortunately, this dynamic can result in individuals like me, who genuinely seek their success, being marginalized while opportunists extract benefits. If I notice a leader deviating from the right path, it’s my responsibility to speak out, rooted in my activist background. My activism isn’t a mere trend; it stems from a conscious decision to contribute positively to society.

Shifting focus to the post-Oshiomhole era, when Mai Mala Buni assumed leadership, I played a role in drafting statements for the caretaker committee. However, as they started maneuvering around the decision to hold a convention, our involvement was phased out. This experience reaffirms my commitment to transparency and accountability, even if it means standing against those in power for the greater good of society.

In Tinubu’s case, I was genuinely surprised when Ganduje’s name came up after Abdullahi Adamu’s removal. Despite my respect for Ganduje, I firmly believe Tinubu didn’t make the right decision. According to the constitution, the state of the removed NWC member should nominate the replacement. In this context, Nasarawa State should have had the honor, especially with someone like Tanko Al-Makura, a party founding member. Al-Makura seemed sidelined due to his proximity to Tinubu and was overlooked for the national chairman position because of his association with the president.

I felt Nasarawa State deserved recognition, and I hoped Tinubu would rectify such issues. It pains me that, under Tinubu’s leadership, the entire North-Central region feels marginalized in national politics. Silence won’t help; constructive criticism is essential for his success. My desire is for Tinubu to be remembered as one of Nigeria’s best presidents.

I am not opposed to leaders, and my party affiliation demonstrates this. I haven’t sought appointments but have been invited. I don’t lobby for positions; my priority is the nation’s well-being. Our generation enjoyed the country’s best, but our children suffer due to poor leadership. It angers me, and I hope Tinubu addresses these issues.

Regarding Tinubu’s presidency, my initial belief was a marked distinction from Buhari’s administration. I expected an active party structure providing advice and engaging in national debates. While Tinubu started well, certain decisions, like subsidy removal, lacked adequate follow-up actions. Open public debates could benefit the government, but the current approach seems restrictive.

Why did I resign from the NWC? Dynamics were at play, and I perceived personal danger and political risks. It was safer for both me and the governors I represented. Life since then has been challenging initially, but I’ve settled down. I am relaxed, having tackled major challenges.

Rumors of El Rufai sponsoring me are unfair. I challenge leaders based on my convictions. I have a close relationship with El Rufai, but it doesn’t dictate my opinions. Allegations of seeking attention for negotiation are baseless. I won’t negotiate my principles.

The recent military drone incident in Kaduna is unfortunate. Solidarity is commendable, but it highlights the existing security challenges. Rebellion fears are among Nigerians facing increased living costs. The focus should be on addressing citizens’ needs.

In Rivers State, APC’s indulgence of Wike allowed for recent conflicts. The premature start of power contests is detrimental, and leaders must prioritize governance over electoral politics. Indulging Wike without local party issues was a mistake, reducing politics to mere electoral contests.

The situation in Rivers seems driven by power struggles for the 2027 elections. Unfortunately, we are prematurely engaging in the next electoral contest instead of focusing on delivering promises and renewing hope for citizens. This shift in priorities is a disservice to the people, and constructive criticism should be welcomed for the betterment of the party and the nation.